PER CURIAM.
Appellant became violently ill about four hours after eating lunch at one of appellee's stores. His doctor diagnosed his illness as food poisoning, and this action was brought on the theory that appellee had served appellant unwholesome or contaminated food. At trial there was no direct evidence that any of the food served appellant was contaminated or unfit for human consumption. After hearing the evidence of both parties, including expert testimony,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.