The term "use" of premises for illegal purposes implies doing of something customarily or habitually upon the premises. The evidence, therefore, must reveal customary and habitual illegal use of the premises by the tenant (U. C. L. Realty Co. v. Brown, 193 Misc. 801; Florgus Realty Corp. v. Reynolds, 123 Misc. 161; Tenement House Dept. of City of N. Y. v. McDevitt, 215 N.Y. 160;
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LITUCHY v. LATHERS
35 Misc.2d 556 (1962)
Samuel Lituchy, Respondent, v. Lawrence Lathers, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 14, 1962
June 14, 1962
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Levine & Cowen (
Concur — HECHT, J. P., HOFSTADTER and TILZER, JJ.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
