HARBET v. FINKELSTEIN


34 Misc.2d 24 (1962)

Samuel Harbet et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hyman B. Finkelstein et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

March 23, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hyman Krugman for plaintiffs. Tannebaum & Goldweber for Hyman B. Finkelstein and others, defendants.


HAROLD TESSLER, J.

In an action to recover moneys allegedly entrusted to the defendants for investment, the latter move to require the plaintiffs to serve a further bill of particulars. The plaintiffs, in a cross motion, seek to vacate the notice to examine them before trial.

Subdivision (d) of rule 115 of the Rules of Civil Practice requires that "In the absence of special circumstances" the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases