BUSCAGLIA v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS


36 N.J. 532 (1962)

178 A.2d 208

SAMUEL BUSCAGLIA, PLAINTIFF, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CATALYTIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY-DEFENDANT-APPELLANT THIRD-PARTY-PLAINTIFF, v. WILLIAM E. SNELL AND MAY SNELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS WILLIAM E. SNELL COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 19, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herbert Horn argued the cause for third-party-defendant-appellant (Messrs. Lloyd, Horn, Megargee & Steedle, attorneys).

Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for third-party-plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano, attorneys; Mr. Michael Patrick King, on the brief).

Mr. Samuel P. Orlando argued the cause for third-party-defendants-respondents.


The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

We granted certification, 36 N.J. 136 (1961), to review the judgment of the Appellate Division whose opinion is reported in 68 N.J.Super. 508 (1961).

With respect to the claim of Owens-Corning Fiberglas against Catalytic Construction Company, we think it unnecessary to consider all of the theses explored by the Appellate Division. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases