DIVISION NO. 892, ETC. v. M. K. & O. TRANSIT LINES, INC.

Civ. No. 5429.

210 F.Supp. 351 (1962)

DIVISION NO. 892, AMALGAMATED ASSOCIATION OF STREET, ELECTRIC RAILWAY AND MOTOR COACH EMPLOYEES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. M. K. & O. TRANSIT LINES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Oklahoma.

November 8, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dyer, Powers & Gotcher, Tulsa, Okl., for plaintiff.

Zimring, Gromfine & Stunstein, Washington, D. C., Robert A. Huffman, James L. Kincaid, Tulsa, Okl., and Karl H. Mueller and Mueller & Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for defendant.


BOHANON, District Judge.

This is an action brought under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185, commonly known as the "Taft Hartley Act," regarding a refusal by the defendant to arbitrate under a collective bargaining agreement between the parties.

Both parties have moved for Summary Judgment.

The plaintiff Union and the defendant Corporation entered into a labor agreement on the 24th day of July, 1959, for a term...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases