COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

Docket No. 70.

206 Cal.App.2d 352 (1962)

24 Cal. Rptr. 113

COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et al., Defendants and Respondents; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

August 1, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George A. Huberty for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dion R. Holm and Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorneys, McMorris M. Dow and Orville I. Wright, Deputy City Attorneys, John Elmer Barricklo and William F. Bourne for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Harold Raines, John B. Reilley and Frank E. Howard as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents and of Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Edward P. Hollingshead, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents.


STONE, J.

The County of Tuolumne, pursuant to article XIII, section 1, of the California Constitution, assessed appropriative water rights located in that county but owned by the City and County of San Francisco. The assessment was reviewed, equalized and adjusted by the State Board of Equalization. Tuolumne County, dissatisfied with the decision, sought a writ of mandate in the superior court of that county, pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases