MERTENS v. LUNDQUIST


15 Wis.2d 540 (1962)

MERTENS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LUNDQUIST and another, Defendants and Appellants: GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, Impleaded Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 6, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by O'Leary, Joyce & Goggin, and oral argument by Morris S. Warzinik, all of Neenah.

For the respondent Charles C. Mertens, individually and as special administrator, there was a brief and oral argument by John E. Esler of Kaukauna.

For the respondent General Casualty Company of Wisconsin there was a brief by Benton, Bosser, Fulton, Menn & Nehs of Appleton, and oral argument by David L. Fulton.


CURRIE, J.

No issue of liability is raised on this appeal. The questions presented are whether two items of damages are excessive, and whether plaintiff's counsel made an improper argument to the jury which had a prejudicial effect upon the jury's determination of damages. The questioned items of damages are the $5,000 for pecuniary loss sustained by plaintiff as the result of the death of his wife and the $3,000 awarded for loss of her society and companionship....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases