HARRISON v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD

No. 14929.

311 F.2d 224 (1962)

Arthur M. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 11, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Dorrell, Toledo, Ohio (Reams, Bretherton & Neipp, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Carl V. Bruggeman, Toledo, Ohio (Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, John W. Hackett, Jr., Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before McALLISTER and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.


ORDER.

This cause came on to be heard on the briefs, argument of counsel, and the full record in the case;

And it appearing after due consideration thereof that the action of the District Judge in granting defendant-appellee's motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff-appellant herein for failure to state a claim upon which the relief sought could be granted constitutes no reversible error;

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases