GOLDBERG v. GOLDBERG


33 Misc.2d 18 (1962)

Mollie Goldberg, Plaintiff, v. Arthur A. Goldberg et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Sullivan County.

January 9, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldstein & Goldstein (Carl P. Goldstein of counsel), for plaintiff. Oppenheim & Oppenheim (Morris M. Oppenheim of counsel), for Jean Sonnenberg, defendant.


LAWRENCE H. COOKE, J.

In this action plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment: (1) that plaintiff is the lawful wife of defendant Arthur A. Goldberg; (2) that the marriage between the defendants is invalid and void; and (3) that the purported divorce obtained by defendant Arthur A. Goldberg against plaintiff in Mexico is invalid and void. Here, plaintiff seeks to examine the answering defendant, Jean Sonnenberg, also known as Jean Goldberg, as to "all the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases