VICK v. HAAS


15 Wis.2d 479 (1962)

VICK and wife, Appellants, v. HAAS and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 6, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Melchior & Melchior of Appleton, attorneys, and Schlotthauer, Jenswold & Reed of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by Robert R. Studt of Madison.

For the respondent Bruce Haas there was a brief and oral argument by Thomas S. Sommers of Milwaukee.

For the respondent General Insurance Company there was a brief by Bradford & Gabert of Appleton, and oral argument by Stanley R. Gabert.


BROWN, J.

Appellants present two reasons why the attempted cancellation of the policy is ineffective: (1) General Insurance could not cancel the automobile coverage afforded in the policy by General Casualty; and (2) if such coverage could be so canceled, the receipt, acceptance, and application of Haas' payment June 13th upon the contract estops General Insurance from later asserting that the coverage terminated June 14th in accordance with the cancellation notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases