1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 201 F.Supp.
  5. 201 F.Supp. 287 (1962)
 

PRESTIGE FLORAL v. CALIFORNIA ARTIFICIAL FLOWER CO.

201 F.Supp. 287 (1962)

PRESTIGE FLORAL, SOCIETE ANONYME, A. E. DeCamp and A. J. Fristot, Plaintiffs, v. CALIFORNIA ARTIFICIAL FLOWER COMPANY, (Inc.) and Calart (Inc.), Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 5, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kane, Dalsimer & Kane, New York City, for plaintiffs, Philip Dalsimer, and John Kurucz, New York City, of counsel.

Barlow & Barlow, Providence, R. I., Herbert B. Barlow, Jr., Providence, R. I., of counsel, and Keith, Bolger, Isner & Byrne, New York City, for defendants, Thomas J. Byrne, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

FEINBERG, District Judge.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff Prestige Floral, Societe Anonyme, ("Prestige") filed its complaint on June 22, 1961, alleging copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 101 and seeking a permanent injunction, damages, and other relief. Jurisdiction is vested in this Court by 17 U.S.C. § 112 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338. The article allegedly infringed is a molded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases