1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 77 N.J.
  5. 77 N.J. Super. 409 (1962)
 

HERRITT v. McKENNA

77 N.J. Super. 409 (1962)

186 A.2d 694

IDA HERRITT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. PRISCILLA McKENNA AND MALCOLM C. McKENNA, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 13, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Milton D. Liebowitz argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Mr. Sheldon M. Liebowitz, attorney).

Mr. Bruce LaSala argued the cause for respondents-respondents (Mr. George G. Tennant, Jr., attorney).

Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and LEWIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether petitioner's temporary employment by respondents was properly adjudged to be "not regular, periodic or recurring" (N.J.S.A. 34:15-36), with the resultant denial of compensation benefits. Both the Workmen's Compensation Division and the County Court on appeal, in denying recovery, held that the proofs established that petitioner was only a casual employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases