Per Curiam.
The respondent presents two objections to the board's recommendation.
The first is that "the record clearly discloses that the solicitation was without knowledge of respondent and was unintentional."
However, a careful study of the record fails to sustain this contention of the respondent. He asks this court to believe that the solicitation was unintentional and without his knowledge. Yet he failed to avail himself of the important...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
