ROSENFIELD v. ANGERSTEIN


71 N.J. Super. 409 (1962)

177 A.2d 38

MATTHEW ROSENFIELD, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF MORRIS ROSENFIELD, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM P. ANGERSTEIN AND WILLIAM H. HAZEL, DEFENDANTS, NEW JERSEY UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 11, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward W. Eichmann argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William C. Gotshalk, of counsel).

Mr. David Novack argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and LEONARD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

The New Jersey Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (hereinafter Fund) appeals from an order of the Superior Court, Law Division, dated June 16, 1961, directing the payment of $3,333.33 and costs of suit (part of the judgment hereinafter mentioned) to the attorney for the administrator ad prosequendum of the estate of Morris Rosenfield, deceased.

The facts have been stipulated. Decedent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases