1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 301 F.2d
  5. 301 F.2d 170 (1962)
 

KAAKINEN v. PEELERS COMPANY

No. 16936.

301 F.2d 170 (1962)

Edwin A. KAAKINEN, and Kaakinen Fish Company, Appellants, v. The PEELERS COMPANY, a Partnership, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Beach, Seattle, Wash., John E. Close, Aberdeen, Wash., for appellant.

Ford E. Smith, Seattle, Wash., W. D. Keith, Keith, Bolger, Isner & Byrne, New York, A. Robert Theibault, Wilkinson, Mawhinney & Theibault, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

The District Court for the Western District of Washington, Southern Division, had jurisdiction over these patent claims under the patent laws of the United States (35 U.S.C. § 281). Jurisdiction of the District Court is founded on 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).

The controversy concerns a machine or picker designed to peel raw shrimp, i. e., to divest edible meat of the head, shell, tail and other appendages. This peeling of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases