Per Curiam.
The principal issue in this cause is whether relators attained the status of provisional civil service employees with the rights incident to such status. The board attacks relators' position on several fronts.
The board's first contention is that the Court of Appeals erred in finding that the test administered to relators was in fact a noncompetitive examination. The board argues that the provisional appointments were based on a questionnaire...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
