1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 17 Wis.2d
  5. 17 Wis.2d 434 (1962)
 

PATRICK v. PATRICK

17 Wis.2d 434 (1962)

PATRICK, Respondent, v. PATRICK, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 2, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Darrell MacIntyre, attorney, and George E. Hass of counsel, both of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. MacIntyre.

For the respondent there was a brief by Wheeler, Van Sickle, Day & Goodman of Madison, and oral argument by Roland B. Day.

FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Character of rights granted to James. Ruth's counsel argues that the judgment provides for dual custody (sometimes referred to as divided, or split custody) even though it specifically refers to James' right as "visitation." In the most-restricted sense, a parent's right to visit his child while in the custody of another, means a right of access to the child. Courts often deem it wise, however, to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases