THARPE v. NEWMAN

No. 392.

125 S.E.2d 315 (1962)

257 N.C. 71

Billy Joe THARPE, by and through his Next Friend, Clero Tharpe, v. Pauline D. NEWMAN.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 2, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McElwee & Hall, North Wilkesboro, and Richard A. Vestal, for plaintiff appellant.

Hudson, Ferrell, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson, W. F. Maready, Winston-Salem, and Allen, Henderson & Williams, Elkin, for defendant appellee.


BOBBITT, Justice.

Apart from plaintiff's proffered testimony, the evidence is deemed insufficient to support a finding that Robert Newman was driving the car when the wreck occurred. Whether the judgment of nonsuit should be affirmed depends upon whether the excluded testimony of plaintiff was competent.

The court, based on G.S. § 8-51 and our decisions in Boyd v. Williams, 207 N.C. 30, 175 S.E. 832, and Davis v. Pearson, 220 N.C. 163, 16 S.E.2d 655,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases