1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 203 F.Supp.
  5. 203 F.Supp. 235 (1962)
 

RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP. v. PROCTOR ELECTRIC CO.

Civ. A. No. 10181.

203 F.Supp. 235 (1962)

RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORPORATION, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. PROCTOR ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, and Ionic Electrostatic Corporation, a corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

March 15, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. C. A. Anderson, Anderson, Barnes & Coe, Baltimore, Md., James P. Hume, Howard W. Clement, Byron, Hume, Goen & Clement, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Everett L. Buckmaster, Buckmaster, White, Mindel & Clarke, Baltimore, Md.; Stanton T. Lawrence, Jr., W. Brown Morton, Raymond B. Canfield, Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor, New York City; Herbert J. Smith, Garfield, N. J., of counsel, for defendants.

R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.

This case involves claims by plaintiff for infringement of patents relating to electrostatic spray-coating systems, and counterclaims by defendants for declarations that said patents are invalid, and are not infringed. The actual devices developed by plaintiff and defendants are used solely in the field of electrostatic painting, and except with respect to a discussion of the prior art, only that field need be considered.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases