1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 311 F.2d
  5. 311 F.2d 125 (1962)
 

IN RE CORY

No. 16874.

311 F.2d 125 (1962)

In re Edna E. CORY, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided November 8, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Crooks, Washington, D. C. (appointed by the District Court), for appellant.

Mr. Ted D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Prin. Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for the District of Columbia.

Before FAHY, WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal presents the sole question whether the District Court, notwithstanding a procedural defect in the initiation of the steps leading to the decree, was without jurisdiction to enter the decree. Being of opinion that in all the circumstances of the case the defect was an irregularity which did not deprive the court of jurisdiction, its decree is

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases