TEMPLETON v. CRULL


16 Wis.2d 416 (1962)

TEMPLETON, Appellant, v. CRULL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 1, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Cleland P. Fisher of Janesville.

For the respondent there was a brief by Berg & Berg of Janesville, and oral argument by Roy E. Berg.


FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Plaintiff's negligence as to speed. Plaintiff contends that there was no evidence to support the jury's finding that he was negligent as to speed. The only evidence of plaintiff's speed was his own testimony that he was traveling 50 miles per hour. The applicable maximum rate was 55. Defendant argues, however, that plaintiff's speed was greater than was reasonable and prudent.

Sec. 346.57...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases