1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 231 Or.
  5. 231 Or. 197 (1962)
 

SWEET ET AL v. STEWART LIVESTOCK CO. ET AL

231 Or. 197 (1962)

372 P.2d 499

SWEET ET AL v. STEWART LIVESTOCK COMPANY ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified June 20, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Tongue, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Edwin D. Hicks and Hicks, Davis, Tongue & Dale, Portland.

Owen M. Panner, Bend, and Roy Kilpatrick, Canyon City, argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief were McKay, Panner & Johnson and Ronald L. Marceau, Bend.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

SLOAN, J.

Plaintiffs prevailed in this action for fraud alleged to have occurred in the sale of a large cattle ranch in Grant county. Plaintiffs, the buyers, alleged several misrepresentations made to them by defendant Stewart. The latter was the alter ego of the corporate defendant, Stewart Livestock Company. The active plaintiff in the negotiations and sale was plaintiff Sweet. We will, therefore, refer to plaintiff and defendant in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases