CHICK v. SUPERIOR CT. OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 20799.

209 Cal.App.2d 201 (1962)

25 Cal. Rptr. 725

NELSON HYDE CHICK et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; CLAUDE JONES et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

November 2, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russ & Moore and Wilbur J. Russ for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Gonick & Schmid, T. Groezinger, Loton Wells, Charles M. McMillan, Henry F. O'Connell and Harry Gonick for Real Parties in Interest.


BRAY, P.J.

Petition for writ of mandate and writ of prohibition.

QUESTION PRESENTED

Does the rule set forth in Witt v. Jackson (1961) 57 Cal.2d 57 [17 Cal.Rptr. 369, 366 P.2d 641], that the contributory negligence of a plaintiff's employer will bar recovery from a third person of workmen's compensation payments made by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases