1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 35 Misc.2d
  5. 35 Misc.2d 370 (1962)
 

BROWN v. BULLOCK

35 Misc.2d 370 (1962)

Ethel Brown et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hugh Bullock et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special and Trial Term, New York County.

May 25, 1962

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosenthal & Gurkin (Pomerantz, Levy & Haudek of counsel), for plaintiffs. Sullivan & Cromwell for Bullock, Clark & Bullock, Ltd., defendants. Hughes, Hubbard, Blair & Reed for Arthur F. Burns and others, defendants. Cole, Friedman & Deitz for Dividend Shares, Inc., defendant. Berger & Berger (Mark Berger of counsel), for Max Goldmann, defendant.

MORRIS E. SPECTOR, J.

By order of this court dated April 16, 1962 this action was dismissed with prejudice to plaintiffs Brown and adopting the practice suggested in Van Aalten v. Mack (9 A.D.2d 648) a hearing was ordered to be held "at which any stockholder of Dividend Shares, Inc. may show sufficient cause, if any he has, why the action herein should not be dismissed with prejudice" and thus become res judicata...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases