COLSON v. RULE


15 Wis.2d 387 (1962)

COLSON, Respondent, v. RULE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 15, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Frank D. Hamilton of Dodgeville.

For the respondent there was a brief by Kramer, Brown & Nelson of Lancaster, and oral argument by Jules F. Brown.


CURRIE, J.

While the verdict contained a question which inquired as to plaintiff Colson's contributory negligence, together with an accompanying question on causation, it contained no question on assumption of risk by Colson. The learned trial court had denied a timely request by defendant's counsel that the verdict contain a question on assumption of risk. One of the reasons advanced for refusing to submit such a question was that the concurring opinions in Baird...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases