MOUNTENEY & MOUNTENEY v. RINGHOFF


33 Misc.2d 362 (1962)

Mounteney & Mounteney et al., Plaintiffs, v. H. W. Ringhoff Corp., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.

January 18, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Mullooly for defendant. Weinstock & Davis for plaintiffs.


MARIO PITTONI, J.

Motion under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is denied.

The complaint is based upon a contract made by the defendant, Ringhoff Corp., and the plaintiffs, Mounteney & Mounteney and English, in the nature of a joint venture, from January 1, 1961 to December...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases