1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 72 N.J.
  5. 72 N.J. Super. 322 (1962)
 

STATE v. LA ROCCA

72 N.J. Super. 322 (1962)

178 A.2d 117

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. ANTHONY LA ROCCA, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County Court, Criminal Division.

Decided January 31, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Warren W. Wilentz argued the motion for defendant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills, attorneys).

Mr. John P. Kozak, Assistant Prosecutor, argued against the motion (Mr. Edward J. Dolan, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).

CONVERY, J.C.C.

This is a motion "for an order allowing counsel to interview, examine or question any juror with respect to the verdict, on the ground that the jurors may have been prejudiced in their deliberations and because of this, the defendant was deprived of a fair and impartial trial." (Emphasis added)

The newly adopted rule R.R. 1:25A, "Limitations on Interviewing Jurors Subsequent To Trial," provides:

"No attorney shall himself...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases