PER CURIAM.
The State offered evidence tending to show defendant had in his possession, at the time and place alleged, 8¾ pints of taxpaid whiskey, and evidence of circumstances tending to show defendant had possession thereof for the purpose of sale. Under the decisions of this Court, the evidence was clearly sufficient to warrant submission to the jury and to support the verdict. Defendant has failed to show prejudicial error. Hence, the verdict and judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.