1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 228 Md.
  5. 228 Md. 162 (1962)
 

CUFFLEY v. HAMMOND

[No. 214, September Term, 1961.]

228 Md. 162 (1962)

178 A.2d 901

CUFFLEY ET UX. v. HAMMOND ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 20, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Goff and Joseph J. Blimline, Jr., with whom were I. Winston Mezger, Callanan & Pitcher and Mezger & Mezger on the brief, for the appellants.

Morris Turk, with whom was Noah A. Hillman on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and MARBURY, JJ.

BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is the fourth in a series of suits between the appellants, the Cuffleys, and the appellees, the Hammonds, involving the boundaries of lots in a subdivision known as Magothy Beach in Anne Arundel County. The first three suits (none of which was appealed to this Court) were suits in ejectment by the Cuffleys against the Hammonds. The present suit is a suit to quiet title...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases