1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 16 Wis.2d
  5. 16 Wis.2d 369 (1962)
 

KOPKE v. RANNEY

16 Wis.2d 369 (1962)

KOPKE, Appellant, v. RANNEY and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 6, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Jerome D. Grant and Nathaniel D. Rothstein, and oral argument by Jack E. Keyes and Bernard J. Plotkin, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Goldberg, Previant & Uelmen of Milwaukee, and oral argument by David L. Uelmen.

FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Rule requiring exhaustion of internal remedies. The complaint states, or sufficiently implies, that plaintiff, acting within his rights as a member of the union, questioned the administration of the affairs of the union; that several members and officers, for the purpose of silencing plaintiff, agreed among themselves to, and did, bring about plaintiff's suspension on unfounded charges, and then, by refusing, without justification, to accept...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases