THAIN v. CITY OF PALO ALTO

Docket No. 20025.

207 Cal.App.2d 173 (1962)

24 Cal. Rptr. 515

ALEXANDER THAIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF PALO ALTO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

August 29, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander Thain, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Robert E. Michalski, City Attorney, and Stanley R. Norton, Assistant City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.


SULLIVAN, J.

In this action involving a weed abatement ordinance of the City of Palo Alto, hereafter referred to as City, the plaintiff, a property owner, appeals from a judgment in favor of the above municipality, its assessor and its superintendent of public works. Although represented by counsel below, plaintiff and appellant appears here in propria persona.

Ordinance No. 1313, which is the center of the present controversy, was adopted by the Council of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases