1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 37 N.J.
  5. 37 N.J. 328 (1962)
 

HAGUE v. WILLIAMS

37 N.J. 328 (1962)

181 A.2d 345

GEORGE JOSEPH HAGUE AND GAIL ROSE HAGUE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WILLIAM E. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 21, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Paul Bartel argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Bartel & Sartoga, attorneys).

Mr. Kevin M. O'Halloran argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint consisting of seven counts. In the first five counts they sought damages based upon the alleged intentional or negligent acts of defendant physician (1) in failing to tell them the truth regarding the health of their child, Linda, (2) in misrepresenting to them her condition of health, (3) in failing to discover her physical impairments. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases