1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 127 S.E.2d
  5. 127 S.E.2d 236 (1962)
 

ROBERTS v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF ASHEVILLE, INC.

No. 89.

127 S.E.2d 236 (1962)

257 N.C. 656

Carl Henry ROBERTS v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF ASHEVILLE, INC.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 19, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Williams & Morris, by Robert R. Williams, Jr., Asheville, for defendant appellant.

Willson & Riddle, by Robert B. Willson, Asheville, for plaintiff appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

When the summons and order extending the time for filing the complaint were served, the defendant entered a special appearance and moved to quash the service and dismiss the action, contending the plaintiff's application and order failed to state the nature and purpose of the suit as required by G.S. § 1-121. Before the hearing on the first motion, however, the defendant filed (conditionally) "Answer, including motion," denying the court had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases