1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 75 N.J.
  5. 75 N.J. Super. 283 (1962)
 

STATE v. BERKO

75 N.J. Super. 283 (1962)

183 A.2d 118

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT BERKO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT GUDGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 26, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herman J. Ziegler argued the cause for appellant Robert Berko.

Mr. A. Donald McKenzie argued the cause for appellant Robert Gudger (Messrs. McKenzie & Hehl, attorneys; Mr. McKenzie, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Solomon Lautman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Vincent P. Keuper, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Lautman, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

Defendants Robert Berko and Robert Gudger were indicted on two counts for uttering "false, forged and counterfeited" checks on July 30, 1960, in violation of N.J.S. 2A:109-1, and aiding and abetting each other in so doing, N.J.S. 2A:85-14. They were found guilty after a jury trial and sentenced to a term of two to four years at State Prison on each...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases