1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 230 Or.
  5. 230 Or. 126 (1962)
 

STANICH v. BUCKLEY ET AL

230 Or. 126 (1962)

368 P.2d 618

STANICH v. BUCKLEY ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded February 7, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lamar Tooze, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were James Arthur Powers, Earle P. Skow and Martin J. Howard, Portland.

Robert L. Myers, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Shuler, Sayre, Winfree & Rankin, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and LUSK, Justices.

REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by plaintiff when he was struck by defendant Buckley's automobile as it was being backed out of its position in plaintiff's parking lot by defendant Carrol. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff moved for a new trial on the ground that the trial court erred in failing to give a requested instruction. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases