PEOPLE v. HELLUM

Docket No. 1706.

205 Cal.App.2d 150 (1962)

22 Cal. Rptr. 724

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FINIS HELLUM, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District.

June 26, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus Johnson, under appointment by the District Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, Edmond B. Mamer and Wallace Tashima, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


STONE, J.*

Appellant and a codefendant were charged with burglary. At their preliminary hearing defense counsel objected to the introduction of most of the pertinent evidence, urging the exclusionary rule of the Cahan case, the hearsay evidence rule, and the unreliability of an informer. Had the objections been sustained and the evidence excluded, there would have been insufficient evidence to hold appellant and his codefendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases