JEROME et al. v. LAUREL PIPE LINE CO.


197 Pa.Super. 131 (1962)

Jerome et al., Appellants, v. Laurel Pipe Line Company.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

January 16, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Mamula, Abraham Fishkin, and Frank Reich, for appellants.

Robert A. Jarvis, Raymond W. Cromer, and Beck, McGinnis & Jarvis, for appellee.

Before RHODES, P.J., ERVIN, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ.


OPINION BY RHODES, P.J., January 16, 1962:

The court below refused plaintiffs' motion for new trial in a land condemnation case.

They allege that a new trial is necessary because of the inadequacy of the jury's verdict of $900, with interest, and because of four alleged trial errors.

Under its authority as a public service corporation, Laurel Pipe Line Company condemned a 30-foot right of way for the installation of an 18-inch oil pipe line extending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases