1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 206 F.Supp.
  5. 206 F.Supp. 120 (1962)
 

GOOSMAN v. A. DUIE PYLE, INC.

Civ. No. 12590.

206 F.Supp. 120 (1962)

Frederick Z. GOOSMAN, to his own use and to the use of Royal Indemnity Company, a body corporate, v. A. DUIE PYLE, INC., a body corporate, Raymond A. Hill, Dennis R. Hill and Harry E. Anderson.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

June 12, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Berman and Bayard Z. Hochberg, Baltimore, Md., and Rose Rothenberg, New York City, attorneys for plaintiff Goosman; Paul M. Higinbothom, attorney for use-plaintiff, Royal Indemnity Company.

John F. King, Baltimore, Md., attorney for defendant A. Duie Pyle, Inc.; Benjamin C. Howard and John F. King, Baltimore, Md., attorneys for defendants Hills and Anderson.

NORTHROP, District Judge.

This is a tort action arising out of a collision between an automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff Goosman and a tractor-trailer owned by the two defendants Hill, leased by them to the defendant A. Duie Pyle, Inc., and driven by the defendant Anderson. The case was tried before a jury. During the course of this trial, the plaintiffs dismissed their cases against all of the defendants except the corporation, which had conceded that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases