NEW LONDON INSTRUMENT CO. v. TAFFET


38 Misc.2d 276 (1962)

New London Instrument Co., Inc., Plaintiff, v. Milton Taffet et al., Copartners Doing Business as Taffet Radio and Television Co., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Paramount Metal Spinning & Stamping Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

December 13, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lucien Nemser for third-party defendant. Epstein & Furman for plaintiff. Steingarten, Wedeen & Weiss (Henry W. Steingarten and Gilbert H. Balter of counsel), for defendants and third-party plaintiffs.


JAMES J. CRISONA, J.,

This is a motion by the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The primary complaint, which must, of course, also be read on this motion (Vaughan v. Globe Neon Sign Co., 10 A.D.2d 568), contains two identical causes of action. The first is asserted against the individual defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases