HOHL v. READINGTON TP.


37 N.J. 271 (1962)

181 A.2d 150

CHARLES HOHL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND READINGTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 7, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard H. Thiele, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Wharton, Stewart & Davis, attorneys; Mr. Richard H. Thiele, Jr., on the brief).

Mr. Leonard Adler argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Adler & Winick, attorneys; Mr. Leonard Adler, on the brief).


The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

The defendant Readington Township appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, declaring the Township's zoning ordinance "invalid insofar as it prohibits a trailer park or mobile home court on premises owned by the plaintiff," Charles Hohl. We certified the cause while it was pending in the Appellate Division.

In 1952 plaintiff bought a three-acre tract of land on the northerly side of U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases