CARNES v. DANCY

No. 36425.

173 Ohio St. 135 (1962)

CARNES, APPELLANT, v. DANCY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 21, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Mills & Mills and Mr. James H. Emsley, for appellant.

Messrs. Carson, Vogelgesang & Sheehan, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

When this cause was originally before this court (Carnes v. Dancy, 171 Ohio St. 421), we were of the opinion, after considering the assignments of error filed by the defendant in the Court of Appeals, that three of the errors found by the Court of Appeals as the basis for its reversal could have been exemplified only by a bill of exceptions. Therefore, if there was no bill of exceptions properly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases