1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 17 Wis.2d
  5. 17 Wis.2d 289 (1962)
 

FALKE v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

17 Wis.2d 289 (1962)

FALKE, Respondent, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 29, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants the cause was argued by John H. Bowers, assistant attorney general, for the Industrial Commission, with whom on the brief was John W. Reynolds, attorney general; and by Edward T. O'Neill of Fond du Lac, for the Chicago Pickle Company and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Arthur M. Wiesender of Berlin.

HALLOWS, J.

On this appeal, the defendant Chicago Pickle Company, its insurer Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and the Industrial Commission argue the synopsis was a fair and full statement of the essential testimony, and any omissions of testimony from the synopsis were not so prejudicial that it was likely the commission would have reached an opposite result from that which it did. We have read the synopsis and the transcript of the evidence and have come...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases