MTR. OF ROSENBLATT v. CITY RENT ADMR.


38 Misc.2d 253 (1962)

In the Matter of Maurice C. Rosenblatt, Petitioner, v. City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

November 8, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice C. Rosenblatt, petitioner in person. Kommel & Rogers (David P. Simerman and Nathan R. Rogers of counsel), for interpleaded respondent. Beatrice Shainswit and Morton Fried for respondent.


BIRDIE AMSTERDAM, J.

Petitioner seeks review and revocation of the final order of the respondent City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator. The final order is stated in the petition to be that of August 14, 1962. By cross motion, respondent moves to dismiss the petition, as a matter of law, upon the ground that this proceeding was not instituted within the time limitation period of 30 days after the issuance of the final order sought to be reviewed....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases