Charles Friedman and his wife made a mortgage encumbering certain real and personal property, securing certain promissory notes and in addition, as set out in covenant 22 typewritten into the mortgage, securing payment to the mortgagee of obligations resulting from its sales of equipment and coffee, etc., to any other restaurant business in which Friedman should engage thereafter.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HOLLOWAY COFFEE CORPORATION v. FRIEDMAN
No. 61-249.
139 So.2d 147 (1962)
HOLLOWAY COFFEE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Charles FRIEDMAN and Ceil Friedman, His Wife, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 27, 1962.
Rehearing Denied April 13, 1962.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jack D. Burris, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Donald F. Frost and Ephraim Collins, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C.J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
