HEYMAN v. AR. WINARICK, INC.


207 F.Supp. 78 (1962)

Everett HEYMAN, d/b/a Pleasure Products Co., Plaintiff, v. AR. WINARICK, INC., Ar. Winarick, Inc., Dura-Gloss Division, Jules Winarick, Hugo L. Bell, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 13, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bass & Friend, New York City, for plaintiff (Solomon H. Friend, New York City, of counsel).

Blackman & Willner, New York City, for defendants (Harold J. Blackman, New York City, of counsel).


COOPER, District Judge.

This is an action for damages, an injunction, and an accounting of profits based upon alleged acts of unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets, unjust enrichment and breach of contract by defendants.

The complaint embodies five causes of action each of which is premised upon substantially the same facts. By stipulation, a sixth cause of action alleging a conspiracy involving defendant Hanley has been withdrawn. Jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases