1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 230 Or.
  5. 230 Or. 46 (1962)
 

RICKARD v. ELLIS

230 Or. 46 (1962)

368 P.2d 396

RICKARD v. ELLIS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 31, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Walton, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Ringo and Walton.

Edward L. Clark, Jr., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Goodenough, Clark & Marsh.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and BRAND, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff in an automobile collision. The jury found that defendant was negligent but that plaintiff suffered no injuries in the collision. Plaintiff moved the court to resubmit the cause to the jury on the ground that the evidence was uncontradicted that plaintiff was injured as a result of the collision. The motion was denied. Plaintiff contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases