1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 210 F.Supp.
  5. 210 F.Supp. 57 (1962)
 

DUCTLESS HOOD CO. v. A AND B HOME APPLIANCES, INC.

Civ. No. 19765.

210 F.Supp. 57 (1962)

The DUCTLESS HOOD CO., Inc., New Milford Construction and Repair Company and George A. Scharmer, Plaintiffs, v. A AND B HOME APPLIANCES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

September 27, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger T. McLean, New York City (Irving Moldauer, N. Dale Sayre, and Adams, Forward & McLean, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Joseph M. Fitzpatrick, New York City (John T. Cella, Lewis H. Eslinger, and Ward, Neal, Haselton, Orme & McElhannon, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

DOOLING, District Judge.

Plaintiff Scharmer devised and in 1959 was granted a patent (No. 2,886,124) on a hood for kitchen ranges that had installed inside it a grease filter, deodorizer, suction unit and ductwork so arranged that the stovetop gases could be sucked in, purged of grease and odors and then recirculated to the kitchen through the louvred front of the hood, all without any connection to the outdoors. In external appearance Scharmer's hood looked like...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases