STEIN v. TRAGER


36 Misc.2d 227 (1962)

Daniel R. Stein, Plaintiff, v. George L. Trager, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Erie County.

September 28, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice Frey and Herald P. Fahringer, Jr., for defendant. Paul J. Brinson for plaintiff.


WILLIAM B. LAWLESS, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the amended complaint on grounds that (1) it does not comply with rule 90 of the Rules of Civil Practice and (2) it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Defendant further moves for an order pursuant to rule 102 requiring plaintiff to serve a further amended complaint to make the same more definite and certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases