1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 233 Or.
  5. 233 Or. 24 (1962)
 

STANBERY v. SMITH ET AL

233 Or. 24 (1962)

377 P.2d 8

STANBERY v. SMITH ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 19, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan Hart, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Hart, Davidson, Veazie & Hanlon, Portland.

Cecil H. Quesseth, Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent State Board of Education. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General.

Grant T. Anderson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Administrative School District No. 48. With him on the brief were King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

Robert C. Stanbery, a taxpayer in School District 104-42 Joint (Sylvan, in Multnomah and Washington Counties) challenged in the circuit court the plan of organization for Administrative School District No. 48 (Washington County) made under the provisions of ORS 330.505 to 330.780. He appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition.

By the enactment of the above-mentioned statutory scheme in 1957, each county of the state was required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases