1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 212 F.Supp.
  5. 212 F.Supp. 22 (1962)
 

HAHN & CLAY v. A. O. SMITH CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 12309.

212 F.Supp. 22 (1962)

HAHN & CLAY, Plaintiff, v. A. O. SMITH CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

May 21, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hayden & Pravel, B. R. Pravel, Bobbitt & Evans, James F. Bobbitt, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.

Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Searls, J. V. Martin and Alfred H. Evans, Houston, Tex., Porter, Johnson, Quale & Porter, I. W. Zirbel, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.

CONNALLY, Chief Judge.

Three causes of action are asserted here; first, for infringement of two patents; second, for unjust enrichment by reason of misappropriation of certain trade secrets; and third, by way of cross action, for wrongful interference with a contract, or with contractual negotiations. The posture of the case at the time of trial was such that A. O. Smith Corporation appeared as plaintiff, and Hahn & Clay, Lawrence F. Megow, and Raymond Pechacek...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases